The Modern Prometheus: Unpacking Shelley's Masterpiece
This blog is assigned by Ms. Megha Trivedi and it answers various type of questions based on the novel.
Introduction to the Author and the Text
Mary Shelley (1797-1851) was a pivotal English author of the Romantic movement, born into a family of radical intellectual thinkers. She was the daughter of the pioneering feminist Mary Wollstonecraft and the political philosopher William Godwin. Her life was steeped in literary culture but also marked by scandal and tragedy, most notably her elopement with the married poet Percy Bysshe Shelley. At just eighteen years old, during a stormy summer gathering in Switzerland with Percy Shelley and Lord Byron, she conceived the idea for her masterpiece, Frankenstein, as part of a challenge to write a ghost story. This experience, combined with her own losses and intellectual upbringing, shaped her into a writer of profound insight into human nature and societal flaws.
Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, first published in 1818, is a groundbreaking novel that masterfully blends Gothic horror with philosophical inquiry, and is often hailed as the first work of science fiction. The story follows Victor Frankenstein, a brilliant but obsessive young scientist who unlocks the secret to creating life. Appalled by the grotesque appearance of his creation, he abandons the sentient being, setting in motion a tragic tale of loneliness, revenge, and despair. The novel is far more than a simple monster story; it's a powerful cautionary tale that explores the dangers of unchecked ambition, the nature of humanity, the destructive force of prejudice, and the moral responsibilities of a creator to their creation. Its themes remain profoundly relevant, continuing to spark debate on the ethics of science and technology today.
Narrative Disparity: Shelley's Novel vs. Its Film Adaptations
Let's compare Mary Shelley's novel to the 1994 film adaptation, Kenneth Branagh's Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
This film, starring Branagh as Victor Frankenstein and Robert De Niro as the Creature, is widely considered one of the most faithful and ambitious adaptations of the novel. Unlike the 1931 classic, it actively tries to incorporate the book's complex plot and philosophical themes. However, it still makes significant changes for dramatic effect.
What the 1994 Film Gets Right (Points of Fidelity)
The Articulate Creature:
This is the film's greatest strength and its most significant point of fidelity. Robert De Niro's Creature, like the one in the novel, learns to speak eloquently, read, and reason. The film preserves the Creature's intelligence and his ability to express his profound suffering and demand justice from Victor, restoring the central tragic conflict that most other adaptations ignore.
The Frame Narrative:
The movie successfully uses the novel's frame story. It begins and ends with Captain Walton's ship trapped in the Arctic ice, where he discovers a near-death Victor Frankenstein. This preserves the crucial parallel between Victor's and Walton's dangerous ambitions and allows Victor to tell his story as a cautionary tale, just as he does in the book.
The Core Plot and Themes:
The film follows the main plot points of the novel closely: Victor's obsessive studies at Ingolstadt, his immediate rejection of his creation, the Creature's secret life with the De Lacey family, the murder of William, the framing of Justine, and the Creature's demand for a female companion. It directly engages with the novel's central themes of creator responsibility, loneliness, and the nature of monstrosity.
Where the 1994 Film Differs (Dramatic Liberties)
The Creation Scene:
While the novel is famously vague about the creation process, Branagh's film makes it a highly visceral, theatrical, and pseudo-scientific event. Victor is shirtless and manic, hoisting the body in a vat of amniotic fluid amidst a storm of electrical eels and machinery. This scene is far more dramatic and physical than the book's quiet, intellectual horror.
Victor's Character:
Kenneth Branagh portrays Victor with a frantic, almost heroic energy. He is constantly running, shouting, and physically grappling with his creation. The novel's Victor is a much more passive and internally tormented character, who frequently falls into long illnesses and bouts of fainting after moments of high stress. The film externalizes his internal conflict into physical action.
The Resurrection of Elizabeth (The Biggest Change):
This is the film's most significant and controversial departure from the novel.
In the novel:
The Creature murders Elizabeth on her wedding night by strangling her. Her death is a brutal and final act of revenge.
In the film:
The Creature kills Elizabeth by ripping her heart out. A grief-stricken Victor then takes her body back to his laboratory and reanimates her, creating a stitched-up, terrified bride. The reanimated Elizabeth, caught between her creator and his original Creature (who sees her as his), ultimately rejects them both and sets herself on fire. This dramatic, operatic climax does not exist in the book and transforms the nature of Victor's obsession into something far more necrophilic and grotesque.
The Creator's Sin: Who Is the Real Monster?
While the Creature performs monstrous deeds, textual evidence overwhelmingly points to Victor Frankenstein as the novel's true monster. His monstrosity is a moral one, rooted in his willful negligence and profound selfishness, which directly corrupts his creation.
The Sin of Abandonment
Victor's monstrosity begins the instant his creation comes to life. Instead of taking responsibility, he is immediately horrified by his work. His reaction is not that of a concerned creator but of someone repulsed by an ugly object, revealing his shallow and ego-driven nature.
"Now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room."
This single act of abandonment is the catalyst for the entire tragedy. He orphans a powerful, sentient being, leaving it to navigate a hostile world alone.
Selfishness Over Justice
Victor’s moral failure is most apparent when he allows the innocent Justine Moritz to be executed for William’s murder, a crime he knows his Creature committed. Rather than confessing and facing the consequences, Victor’s primary concern is his own suffering and reputation.
"Thus spoke my prophetic soul, as, torn by remorse, horror, and despair, I beheld those I loved spend vain sorrow upon the graves of William and Justine, the first hapless victims to my unhallowed arts."
He frames himself as the primary victim, demonstrating a grotesque self-pity while another person dies because of his cowardice.
The Creature's Testimony
The most compelling evidence comes from the Creature himself, who explains that he was not born evil but was twisted by the misery of constant rejection. He eloquently argues that his malevolence is a direct product of Victor's failure.
"I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous."
The Creature understands his own fall from grace and places the responsibility squarely on Victor, who denied him the companionship and acceptance he needed to remain good. He directly confronts Victor’s failure as a creator, stating:
"Remember that I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed."
Ultimately, the novel defines monstrosity by action and moral choice, not appearance. The Creature is physically grotesque, but Victor is morally repulsive. He is a man who, through fear, pride, and a complete lack of empathy, creates a monster and then blames it for its own monstrous acts.
"How Dangerous is the Acquirement of Knowledge"
Yes, the search for knowledge can be profoundly dangerous and destructive, but only when it is pursued without morality, responsibility, and foresight. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is the quintessential literary exploration of this very idea, warning that the danger lies not in the knowledge itself, but in the hubris of the seeker.
The Motive Corrupts the Quest
The first sign of danger in Frankenstein is Victor's motivation. He is not driven by a philanthropic desire to benefit humanity, but by a consuming and selfish ambition. He speaks of how his mind was "filled with one thought, one conception, one purpose," to "explore unknown powers." This quest is for his own glory. He dreams that a:
"...new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me."
This egotistical ambition taints the entire endeavor. When the pursuit of knowledge is a quest for personal power rather than a humble act of discovery, it becomes a corrupting force.
Knowledge Without Wisdom
Victor’s ultimate failure is a lack of wisdom. He possesses the intellectual brilliance to animate life but has no emotional maturity or ethical framework to manage his creation. He is so obsessed with the challenge that he ignores the consequences. Upon seeing his creation alive, his first reaction is not one of responsibility, but of shallow disgust.
"His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful! Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath... a horrid contrast with his watery eyes."
This immediate rejection of the "wretch" he brought into the world proves he has scientific knowledge, but no moral wisdom.
The Final Verdict
The lesson from Frankenstein, delivered by Victor himself, is a direct warning about the perils of ambition without conscience. He explicitly tells the explorer Robert Walton to:
"Learn from me... how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow."
The novel does not condemn science. Instead, it serves as a powerful cautionary tale that knowledge must be tempered with humility, and that scientific advancement must always be guided by a profound sense of accountability.
The Making of a Monster: A Study in Nurture
Victor Frankenstein's creature was not inherently evil; he was turned into a monster by society's constant rejection and his creator's cruel abandonment. Mary Shelley's novel presents a powerful argument for nurture over nature, showing how a being with the capacity for good can be corrupted by unrelenting misery.
Initial Benevolence
When the creature first comes to life, he is like a child: confused, sensitive, and benevolent. He is driven by a desire for connection and shows deep empathy, particularly when he secretly observes the De Lacey family. He is moved by their kindness and performs secret acts of charity, like gathering firewood for them. His initial state is one of goodness, proving he was not born with a malicious nature.
The Catalyst of Rejection
The creature's turn to violence is a direct result of the horror and prejudice he faces from every human he encounters. He is:
Abandoned at birth by his creator, Victor, simply for his appearance.
Shunned and attacked by villagers he tries to approach.
Violently driven away by the De Lacey family, the very people he had come to love and admire.
This constant, brutal rejection extinguishes his natural goodness and replaces it with a desperate rage born from profound loneliness.
The Creature's Declaration
The most compelling evidence comes from the creature himself, who eloquently explains his own tragic transformation to Victor. He is fully aware that his evil deeds are a product of his suffering, not his nature. He states plainly:
"I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend."
He later summarizes his condition with the heartbreakingly simple logic: "I am malicious because I am miserable." The creature is Shelley's ultimate tragic figure, a testament to the idea that monstrosity is not something one is born with, but something that is created by a lack of compassion.
Ambition vs. Humanity: The Need for Scientific Boundaries
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein argues powerfully that there should be ethical limits on scientific exploration. The novel suggests that the limit is not on the acquisition of knowledge itself, but on the accountability of the scientist. The story serves as a timeless cautionary tale about the catastrophic consequences of pursuing scientific advancement without a corresponding sense of moral responsibility.
The Limit of Accountability
The central tragedy of Frankenstein is not that Victor creates life, but that he fails to take responsibility for it. He is a brilliant scientist but a moral failure. The novel's primary argument is that scientific exploration must be bound by moral foresight—the duty to consider, plan for, and be accountable for the consequences of one's work. Victor's complete lack of a plan for his creation's well-being is his greatest transgression.
A Warning from the Text
Having learned this lesson through immense suffering, Victor himself articulates the novel's central warning. He cautions the ambitious explorer Robert Walton against his own brand of reckless ambition, making it clear that some pursuits are too dangerous if not guided by wisdom and restraint. He tells Walton:
"Learn from me... how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow."
This is not a call to embrace ignorance, but a plea to temper ambition with humility and to recognize the destructive potential of knowledge when wielded without a conscience.
A Lesson Learned: The Choice of Robert Walton
The novel doesn't just show the failure; it also shows the correct path. Robert Walton, the arctic explorer who rescues Victor, is a direct parallel to him—both men are driven by a thirst for glory through discovery. However, unlike Victor, Walton ultimately makes the morally responsible choice. When his crew fears for their lives and begs him to turn back, he faces a critical decision: his personal ambition versus the lives of his men. After listening to Victor's tragic story, Walton agrees to abandon his quest. He laments his "blasted" hopes but chooses humanity over glory. His decision to turn back is the novel's final, explicit endorsement of limits, demonstrating that the ultimate responsibility of any leader or innovator is to the well-being of others.
The true limit, according to Frankenstein, is a profound sense of ethical duty. Science and exploration must always be in service to humanity, and its practitioners must be held responsible for the impact of their discoveries.
Conclusion
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein remains a profound and enduring work because it masterfully explores the most critical questions of its time and our own. The novel is not merely a monster story but a deep, cautionary tale about the very nature of humanity. It argues that true monstrosity is born not from grotesque appearances, but from moral failures—from the abdication of responsibility, the cruelty of prejudice, and the pursuit of knowledge without a conscience. Whether analyzing the tragic corruption of the Creature, the selfish ambition of Victor, or the ethical limits of science, the novel forces us to confront the idea that we are all capable of creating monsters, both literally and figuratively. Its central, timeless warning is that our greatest discoveries and ambitions are worthless without a corresponding growth in empathy and wisdom.
Levine, George. "'Frankenstein' and the Tradition of Realism." Novel: A Forum on Fiction, vol. 7, no. 1, 1973, pp. 14–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1342378.
No comments:
Post a Comment