Thursday, December 25, 2025

The Widening Gyre: A Deep Dive into W.B. Yeats, Modernism, and the Apocalyptic Imagination


This blog task is assigned by Prof. Dr. Dilip Barad, the head of the Department of English MKBU, on W.B.Yeats's poems where we will analyse both of his poems with the help of online video lectures, Hindi podcast, and study questions. 

Introduction 

William Butler Yeats stands as a monumental figure in twentieth-century literature, bridging the worlds of Romanticism and Modernism with a distinct, often prophetic voice. His work is characterized by a profound engagement with the political turmoil of his native Ireland, the catastrophe of global conflict, and a complex, personal mythology that sought to impose order upon chaotic experience. In poems such as "The Second Coming" and "On Being Asked for a War Poem," Yeats grapples with the disintegration of traditional structures—historical, moral, and spiritual—while questioning the role of the artist in times of crisis. These works illustrate his mastery of symbol and form, revealing a poet who refuses to offer easy reassurances, choosing instead to witness the terrifying birth of new, uncertain eras.


The Online Class Experience & "The Pandemic Reading"

1.1 The "Pandemic Reading" of The Second Coming

In the video recordings, the discussion centers on a groundbreaking interpretation often missed in traditional textbooks: the influence of the 1918–1920 Spanish Flu.

  • The Blood-Dimmed Tide: Traditionally, critics read the "blood-dimmed tide" as a metaphor for the bloodshed of World War I or the Bolshevik Revolution. However, as discussed in the class, the imagery is startlingly clinical. During the 1918 influenza pandemic, victims often suffered from severe hemorrhaging. The virus would cause blood to fill the lungs, literally "drowning" the patient in their own fluids. Yeats’s phrase "The ceremony of innocence is drowned" takes on a terrifyingly literal meaning here.
  • The Invisible Enemy: The class discussion highlights how the "rough beast" represents the invisible, creeping terror of the virus. Unlike a war, where the enemy is a soldier across a trench, a pandemic is an "anarchy loosed upon the world" that cannot be fought with guns. The "widening gyre" becomes the spiral of infection rates, spinning beyond the control of the "falconer" (science/government).

1.2 "Refusal-as-Assent" in On Being Asked for a War Poem

The second major takeaway from the online class is the concept of Refusal-as-Assent.

  • The Paradox: When Yeats was asked to write a war poem, he refused. But he did so by writing a poem. This is a brilliant Modernist paradox. The class explained that this is not mere cowardice or aloofness; it is an assertion of the autonomy of art.
  • The Statesman vs. The Poet: The video lectures emphasize the line, "We have no gift to set a statesman right". This is often read as humility, but the class revealed it as biting sarcasm (or Dhvani in Indian poetics). Yeats implies that the "statesman" is too entrenched in the dirty business of "meddling" to listen to the higher truths of poetry. The poet’s role is not to offer propaganda for the "right" side of a war, but to preserve the eternal human experiences—symbolized by the "young girl" and the "old man"—that war threatens to destroy.

1.3 Student Responses & Indian Poetics

A unique feature of our study material is the integration of Indian aesthetic theories (Rasa and Dhvani) into the analysis of Western Modernism. In the "Student Responses" section of the blog, we see fascinating applications of these theories:

  • Vakrokti (Oblique Speech): Students argued that On Being Asked for a War Poem is a prime example of Vakrokti. Yeats’s refusal is "crooked" or indirect speech; he says "I will not speak of war," which is, in itself, a powerful statement about war.
  • Adbhutam Rasa (The Sentiment of Wonder/Terror): In The Second Coming, the "rough beast" evokes Adbhutam—a sense of awe mixed with terror. The "blank and pitiless" gaze constitutes a "Bibhatsa" (disgust/grotesque) element that disrupts the "ceremony of innocence".

Insights from the Hindi Podcast

2.1 The "Zeitgeist" (Spirit of the Times)

The podcast connects Yeats's 1919 "Spiritus Mundi" to our modern "Zeitgeist." The hosts discuss how the anxiety Yeats felt—watching civilization crumble under war and disease—mirrors the collective anxiety of the 2020s. The speakers highlight that literary critics often overlook the "biological catastrophe" in favor of political ones, a gap this podcast seeks to fill.

  • "Readiness is All": One of the key "life lessons" extracted in the podcast discussion is the Shakespearean/Yeatsian idea that we cannot control the "gyre" (the external chaos), but we can control our "readiness". The podcast draws a parallel between the "falcon cannot hear the falconer" and our modern disconnection from truth due to social media algorithms and "fake news".
  • The "Mind Game": The podcast emphasizes that On Being Asked for a War Poem teaches us about mental preservation. In a world of 24-hour news cycles demanding our outrage (the "war"), Yeats advises us to focus on the "young girl" (beauty) or the "old man" (wisdom). This is presented not as escapism, but as a survival strategy for the mind—a way to keep the "centre" holding when things fall apart.

Detailed Thematic & Textual Analysis

3.1 The Second Coming: A Blueprint of Chaos

The Gyre as History:
Yeats believed history moved in 2,000-year cycles (gyres). The Christian era (order, centralization) was ending, and a new, antithetical era (chaos, decentralization) was beginning.

"Turning and turning in the widening gyre"

The repetition of "turning" mimics the dizziness of a world spinning out of control. The "widening" suggests that the centrifugal force (chaos) has overcome the centripetal force (order).

The Breakdown of Communication:

"The falcon cannot hear the falconer"

This is the defining metaphor of the poem. The "falcon" represents humanity, logic, or society. The "falconer" represents the controlling principle—God, reason, or tradition. The silence between them is where the terror lies. It is not that the falconer is dead, but that the falcon has gone too far to hear him. This mirrors the Modernist theme of alienation.

The New Nativity:
Yeats subverts the Christian Nativity story. Instead of a baby Jesus bringing peace, we have:

"A shape with lion body and the head of a man"

This Sphinx-like figure represents a pre-Christian, primal force. It has a "gaze blank and pitiless as the sun". The sun is indifferent; it shines on the murderer and the saint alike. This "pitilessness" is the hallmark of the new age—an age of scientific detachment and industrial slaughter. The beast "slouches"—a verb that suggests a grotesque, clumsy, yet inevitable birth.

3.2 On Being Asked for a War Poem: The Sounds of Silence

The Argument for Silence:

"I think it better that in times like these / A poet's mouth be silent"

Yeats argues that "times like these" (times of crisis) are exactly when poetry should not try to be journalism. Journalism reports the "blood-dimmed tide"; poetry must look beyond it. If a poet engages in the "slanging match" of politics, they lose their "gift".

The Archetypes:

"A young girl in the indolence of her youth, / Or an old man upon a winter's night."

These figures represent the cyclical, enduring aspects of human life. Governments rise and fall, wars begin and end, but youth and age, love and death, remain. Yeats chooses to write about these "eternal" subjects as a form of resistance against the "temporal" noise of war.


Expanded Discussion Responses

(i) Discussion Question: Imagery of Disintegration

Q: How does Yeats use imagery to convey a sense of disintegration in The Second Coming?

Yeats does not just tell us the world is ending; he uses a specific sequence of kinetic and visual imagery to make us feel the structural collapse.

  1. Kinetic Disintegration (Motion): The poem begins with motion that is out of control—"Turning and turning." The "widening gyre" is a geometric image of disintegration. As the spiral expands, the center becomes weaker. The famous line "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold" is not abstract; it is a physics description of a flywheel spinning too fast until it shatters.
  2. Liquid Disintegration (The Flood): The "blood-dimmed tide" suggests that the boundaries between land and sea, life and death, have dissolved. A "tide" is usually a natural, rhythmic force (controlled by the moon), but here it is "loosed" (unleashed) and "blood-dimmed." It represents a violation of nature's laws.
  3. Moral Disintegration: The image of the "best" lacking conviction while the "worst" are full of "passionate intensity" describes the disintegration of the moral compass. It visualizes a world where the moderates are paralyzed by doubt (think of the "indecisive" Hamlet), while the fanatics (fascists, extremists) act with terrifying certainty.
  4. Biological Disintegration: As noted in the Pandemic Reading, the "drowning" of innocence conveys the disintegration of the human body itself under the assault of disease or violence.

(ii) Discussion Question: The Politics of Apolitical Poetry

Q: Do you agree with Yeats's assertion in On Being Asked for a War Poem that poetry should remain apolitical?

This is one of the most debated questions in literary history.

  • The Case for Agreement (The Yeatsian View): One might agree with Yeats that art has a higher calling than politics. Political poetry often ages poorly; it requires footnotes to explain the specific "statesman" or "law" being critiqued. By remaining "apolitical," the poet touches on the universal. For example, Homer's Iliad is not just about the Trojan War; it is about rage and grief. Yeats fears that if he writes about the "war," he becomes a tool of the "statesman"—a propagandist rather than a prophet. His silence is a way of protecting the purity of the language from the corruption of political slogans.
  • The Case for Disagreement (The Activist View): However, many argue that "silence" is a political choice that favors the oppressor. As the podcast noted, refusing to speak against a war can be seen as "refusal-as-assent"—implicitly accepting the status quo. Poets like Wilfred Owen or W.H. Auden (who famously wrote "We must love one another or die") believed that the poet has a moral duty to warn, to witness, and to "set the statesman right," or at least to expose the statesman's lies. To say "We have no gift" can be seen as a cop-out, a refusal to use the power of words to stop suffering.

Synthesis: Perhaps the answer lies in the middle. Poetry should be political, but not politician-like. It should address the human cost of politics (like the "blood-dimmed tide") without becoming a manifesto for a specific party.


Analytical Exercise – Comparative Study

Task: Compare the treatment of war in On Being Asked for a War Poem with other war poems by Wilfred Owen or Siegfried Sassoon.

This comparison reveals the spectrum of Modernist responses to the catastrophe of WWI.

Feature W.B. Yeats Wilfred Owen Siegfried Sassoon
Stance Detached/Aristocratic: He looks down on the war from a distance (his "ivory tower"). He sees it as a temporary madness beneath the dignity of art. Immersive/Witness: He is in the mud. He writes from the perspective of the victim. His goal is "The Pity of War". Satirical/Angry: He is angry at the leadership. He writes to expose the incompetence of the "statesmen" Yeats ignores.
Imagery Abstract/Archetypal: "Winter's night," "indolence," "silent mouth." No guns, no blood, no mud. Visceral/Grotesque: "Froth-corrupted lungs," "vile, incurable sores," "gas," "mud". Conversational/Biting: "Good-morning; good-morning!" The cheerful greeting of a General sending men to die.
Philosophy Art for Art's Sake: The poet must preserve Beauty and Truth amidst chaos. Politics is a "meddling". Art as Protest: The poet must tell the Truth, even if it is ugly, to stop the "Old Lie" that war is glorious. Art as Weapon: Poetry is a tool to attack the establishment and mock the "incompetent" authority.
Result A poem about the nature of poetry. A poem about the physical reality of death. A poem about the social hierarchy of war.

Conclusion of Analysis:
Yeats represents the "High Modernist" desire to build a fortress of culture against the chaos. Owen and Sassoon represent the "Trench Poets" who believe the fortress has already been blown up, and the poet’s job is to document the ruins. Yeats’s silence is a philosophical shield; Owen’s scream is a moral imperative.


Creative Activity

Prompt: Write a modernist-inspired poem reflecting on a contemporary global crisis, drawing on Yeats's themes and techniques.

Below is a sample poem that mimics Yeats's use of "gyres," "beasts," and "disintegration" but applies them to the crisis of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Disinformation.

The Silicon Gyre

The server hums in the widening web, The user cannot hear the algorithm. Truth falls apart; the logic cannot hold; Mere data is loosed upon the world, The pixelated tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of wisdom is drowned; The best lack all connection, while the worst Are full of viral intensity. Surely some update is at hand; Surely the Great Reset is at hand. The Great Reset! Hardly are those words out When a vast image out of Cloudus Mundi Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of Silicon Valley A shape with metal body and the mind of a man, A gaze blank and pitiless as a lens, Is processing its fast thighs, while all about it Reel shadows of the indignant Twitter birds. The power drops again; but now I know That twenty centuries of human sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a glowing screen, And what rough bot, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards the network to be born?


Conclusion 

W.B. Yeats stands as a titan of literature because he did not just write about his time; he wrote about the cycles of time. In The Second Coming, he gave us the vocabulary to describe the feeling of impending doom—whether it's a world war, a pandemic, or a climate catastrophe. In On Being Asked for a War Poem, he gave us a controversial but essential defense of the artist's right to remain independent.

To truly master these poems, you must read them not just as historical documents, but as living texts. The "rough beast" is always slouching towards us; the "gyre" is always widening. The question is: will you be the falcon that gets lost, or the poet who finds the words to describe the storm?


References 

Barad, Dilip. "On Being Asked for a War Poem." YouTube, 28 Jan. 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0eIBObJ7Ys.
Barad, Dilip. (2025). W.B. Yeats's Poems: The Second Coming - & - On Being Asked for a War Poem. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17299.18720
"Hindi Podcast on 'The Second Coming' and 'On Being Asked for a War Poem'." YouTube, 1 Feb. 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAaWDvA2Gt4.
"The Second Coming." YouTube, 20 Jan. 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9qX3F0gsOQ.
"W.H. Auden: Poems." Dilip Barad's Blog, 2021,  blog.dilipbarad.com/2021/05/whauden-poems.html?m=1.
Yeats, W. B. "On Being Asked for a War Poem." The Wild Swans at Coole, Macmillan, 1919.
Yeats, W. B. "The Second Coming." Michael Robartes and the Dancer, Cuala Press, 1921.

The Widening Gyre: A Deep Dive into W.B. Yeats, Modernism, and the Apocalyptic Imagination

Date: January 02, 2025
Category: Modernist Poetry | Study Material
Reading Time: 15 Minutes


Welcome back to our literary exploration. Today, we are not just skimming the surface of W.B. Yeats; we are diving into the turbulent waters of his most prophetic works: "The Second Coming" and "On Being Asked for a War Poem". This blog post is designed to be your ultimate companion for these poems. It synthesizes the visual content from our online classes, the vernacular insights from the Hindi podcast, and the rigorous academic framework provided in your research notes. We will explore how a poem written in 1919 about the Spanish Flu and World War I speaks directly to our post-COVID world, and why a poet’s silence can sometimes be louder than his words.


Part 1: The Online Class Experience & "The Pandemic Reading"

Our online sessions on these poems were not typical lectures. They ventured into "The Third Reading"—a perspective that moves beyond the biographical and political to the biological.

1.1 The "Pandemic Reading" of The Second Coming

In the video recordings, the discussion centers on a groundbreaking interpretation often missed in traditional textbooks: the influence of the 1918–1920 Spanish Flu.

  • The Blood-Dimmed Tide: Traditionally, critics read the "blood-dimmed tide" as a metaphor for the bloodshed of World War I or the Bolshevik Revolution. However, as discussed in the class, the imagery is startlingly clinical. During the 1918 influenza pandemic, victims often suffered from severe hemorrhaging. The virus would cause blood to fill the lungs, literally "drowning" the patient in their own fluids. Yeats’s phrase "The ceremony of innocence is drowned" takes on a terrifyingly literal meaning here.
  • The Invisible Enemy: The class discussion highlights how the "rough beast" represents the invisible, creeping terror of the virus. Unlike a war, where the enemy is a soldier across a trench, a pandemic is an "anarchy loosed upon the world" that cannot be fought with guns. The "widening gyre" becomes the spiral of infection rates, spinning beyond the control of the "falconer" (science/government).

1.2 "Refusal-as-Assent" in On Being Asked for a War Poem

The second major takeaway from the online class is the concept of Refusal-as-Assent.

  • The Paradox: When Yeats was asked to write a war poem, he refused. But he did so by writing a poem. This is a brilliant Modernist paradox. The class explained that this is not mere cowardice or aloofness; it is an assertion of the autonomy of art.
  • The Statesman vs. The Poet: The video lectures emphasize the line, "We have no gift to set a statesman right". This is often read as humility, but the class revealed it as biting sarcasm (or Dhvani in Indian poetics). Yeats implies that the "statesman" is too entrenched in the dirty business of "meddling" to listen to the higher truths of poetry. The poet’s role is not to offer propaganda for the "right" side of a war, but to preserve the eternal human experiences—symbolized by the "young girl" and the "old man"—that war threatens to destroy.

1.3 Student Responses & Indian Poetics

A unique feature of our study material is the integration of Indian aesthetic theories (Rasa and Dhvani) into the analysis of Western Modernism. In the "Student Responses" section of the blog, we see fascinating applications of these theories:

  • Vakrokti (Oblique Speech): Students argued that On Being Asked for a War Poem is a prime example of Vakrokti. Yeats’s refusal is "crooked" or indirect speech; he says "I will not speak of war," which is, in itself, a powerful statement about war.
  • Adbhutam Rasa (The Sentiment of Wonder/Terror): In The Second Coming, the "rough beast" evokes Adbhutam—a sense of awe mixed with terror. The "blank and pitiless" gaze constitutes a "Bibhatsa" (disgust/grotesque) element that disrupts the "ceremony of innocence".

Part 2: Insights from the Hindi Podcast

For those who accessed the Hindi podcast linked in the blog, the understanding of these poems becomes more visceral and culturally grounded.

2.1 The "Zeitgeist" (Spirit of the Times)

The podcast connects Yeats's 1919 "Spiritus Mundi" to our modern "Zeitgeist." The hosts discuss how the anxiety Yeats felt—watching civilization crumble under war and disease—mirrors the collective anxiety of the 2020s. The speakers highlight that literary critics often overlook the "biological catastrophe" in favor of political ones, a gap this podcast seeks to fill.

  • "Readiness is All": One of the key "life lessons" extracted in the podcast discussion is the Shakespearean/Yeatsian idea that we cannot control the "gyre" (the external chaos), but we can control our "readiness". The podcast draws a parallel between the "falcon cannot hear the falconer" and our modern disconnection from truth due to social media algorithms and "fake news".
  • The "Mind Game": The podcast emphasizes that On Being Asked for a War Poem teaches us about mental preservation. In a world of 24-hour news cycles demanding our outrage (the "war"), Yeats advises us to focus on the "young girl" (beauty) or the "old man" (wisdom). This is presented not as escapism, but as a survival strategy for the mind—a way to keep the "centre" holding when things fall apart.

Part 3: Detailed Thematic & Textual Analysis

Let us now turn to the text itself, expanding on the notes provided in your ResearchGate PDF.

3.1 The Second Coming: A Blueprint of Chaos

The Gyre as History:
Yeats believed history moved in 2,000-year cycles (gyres). The Christian era (order, centralization) was ending, and a new, antithetical era (chaos, decentralization) was beginning.

"Turning and turning in the widening gyre"

The repetition of "turning" mimics the dizziness of a world spinning out of control. The "widening" suggests that the centrifugal force (chaos) has overcome the centripetal force (order).

The Breakdown of Communication:

"The falcon cannot hear the falconer"

This is the defining metaphor of the poem. The "falcon" represents humanity, logic, or society. The "falconer" represents the controlling principle—God, reason, or tradition. The silence between them is where the terror lies. It is not that the falconer is dead, but that the falcon has gone too far to hear him. This mirrors the Modernist theme of alienation.

The New Nativity:
Yeats subverts the Christian Nativity story. Instead of a baby Jesus bringing peace, we have:

"A shape with lion body and the head of a man"

This Sphinx-like figure represents a pre-Christian, primal force. It has a "gaze blank and pitiless as the sun". The sun is indifferent; it shines on the murderer and the saint alike. This "pitilessness" is the hallmark of the new age—an age of scientific detachment and industrial slaughter. The beast "slouches"—a verb that suggests a grotesque, clumsy, yet inevitable birth.

3.2 On Being Asked for a War Poem: The Sounds of Silence

The Argument for Silence:

"I think it better that in times like these / A poet's mouth be silent"

Yeats argues that "times like these" (times of crisis) are exactly when poetry should not try to be journalism. Journalism reports the "blood-dimmed tide"; poetry must look beyond it. If a poet engages in the "slanging match" of politics, they lose their "gift".

The Archetypes:

"A young girl in the indolence of her youth, / Or an old man upon a winter's night."

These figures represent the cyclical, enduring aspects of human life. Governments rise and fall, wars begin and end, but youth and age, love and death, remain. Yeats chooses to write about these "eternal" subjects as a form of resistance against the "temporal" noise of war.


Part 4: Expanded Discussion Responses

Below are the detailed responses to the questions in your study material, significantly expanded for the blog format.

(i) Discussion Question: Imagery of Disintegration

Q: How does Yeats use imagery to convey a sense of disintegration in The Second Coming?

Yeats does not just tell us the world is ending; he uses a specific sequence of kinetic and visual imagery to make us feel the structural collapse.

  1. Kinetic Disintegration (Motion): The poem begins with motion that is out of control—"Turning and turning." The "widening gyre" is a geometric image of disintegration. As the spiral expands, the center becomes weaker. The famous line "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold" is not abstract; it is a physics description of a flywheel spinning too fast until it shatters.
  2. Liquid Disintegration (The Flood): The "blood-dimmed tide" suggests that the boundaries between land and sea, life and death, have dissolved. A "tide" is usually a natural, rhythmic force (controlled by the moon), but here it is "loosed" (unleashed) and "blood-dimmed." It represents a violation of nature's laws.
  3. Moral Disintegration: The image of the "best" lacking conviction while the "worst" are full of "passionate intensity" describes the disintegration of the moral compass. It visualizes a world where the moderates are paralyzed by doubt (think of the "indecisive" Hamlet), while the fanatics (fascists, extremists) act with terrifying certainty.
  4. Biological Disintegration: As noted in the Pandemic Reading, the "drowning" of innocence conveys the disintegration of the human body itself under the assault of disease or violence.

(ii) Discussion Question: The Politics of Apolitical Poetry

Q: Do you agree with Yeats's assertion in On Being Asked for a War Poem that poetry should remain apolitical?

This is one of the most debated questions in literary history.

  • The Case for Agreement (The Yeatsian View): One might agree with Yeats that art has a higher calling than politics. Political poetry

    Part 5: Analytical Exercise – Comparative Study

    [span_45](start_span)

    Task: Compare the treatment of war in On Being Asked for a War Poem with other war poems by Wilfred Owen or Siegfried Sassoon.[span_45](end_span)

    [span_46](start_span)

    This comparison reveals the spectrum of Modernist responses to the catastrophe of WWI[span_46](end_span).

    [span_51](start_span) [span_54](start_span) [span_55](start_span) [span_56](start_span) [span_57](start_span) [span_58](start_span)
    Feature W.B. Yeats Wilfred Owen Siegfried Sassoon
    Stance Detached/Aristocratic: He looks down on the war from a distance (his "ivory tower"). [span_47](start_span)He sees it as a temporary madness beneath the dignity of art[span_47](end_span). Immersive/Witness: He is in the mud. He writes from the perspective of the victim. [span_48](start_span)His goal is "The Pity of War"[span_48](end_span). Satirical/Angry: He is angry at the leadership. [span_49](start_span)He writes to expose the incompetence of the "statesmen" Yeats ignores[span_49](end_span).
    Imagery Abstract/Archetypal: "Winter's night," "indolence," "silent mouth." [span_50](start_span)No guns, no blood, no mud[span_50](end_span).Visceral/Grotesque: "Froth-corrupted lungs," "vile, incurable sores," "gas," "mud"[span_51](end_span). Conversational/Biting: "Good-morning; good-morning!" [span_52](start_span)The cheerful greeting of a General sending men to die[span_52](end_span).
    Philosophy Art for Art's Sake: The poet must preserve Beauty and Truth amidst chaos. [span_53](start_span)Politics is a "meddling"[span_53](end_span).Art as Protest: The poet must tell the Truth, even if it is ugly, to stop the "Old Lie" that war is glorious[span_54](end_span).Art as Weapon: Poetry is a tool to attack the establishment and mock the "incompetent" authority[span_55](end_span).
    ResultA poem about the nature of poetry[span_56](end_span).A poem about the physical reality of death[span_57](end_span).A poem about the social hierarchy of war[span_58](end_span).

    Conclusion of Analysis:
    Yeats represents the "High Modernist" desire to build a fortress of culture against the chaos. [span_59](start_span)Owen and Sassoon represent the "Trench Poets" who believe the fortress has already been blown up, and the poet’s job is to document the ruins[span_59](end_span). Yeats’s silence is a philosophical shield; [span_60](start_span)Owen’s scream is a moral imperative[span_60](end_span).


    Part 6: Creative Activity

    [span_61](start_span)

    Prompt: Write a modernist-inspired poem reflecting on a contemporary global crisis, drawing on Yeats's themes and techniques[span_61](end_span).

    Below is a sample poem that mimics Yeats's use of "gyres," "beasts," and "disintegration" but applies them to the crisis of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Disinformation.

    The Silicon Gyre

    The server hums in the widening web, The user cannot hear the algorithm. Truth falls apart; the logic cannot hold; Mere data is loosed upon the world, The pixelated tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of wisdom is drowned; The best lack all connection, while the worst Are full of viral intensity. Surely some update is at hand; Surely the Great Reset is at hand. The Great Reset! Hardly are those words out When a vast image out of Cloudus Mundi Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of Silicon Valley A shape with metal body and the mind of a man, A gaze blank and pitiless as a lens, Is processing its fast thighs, while all about it Reel shadows of the indignant Twitter birds. The power drops again; but now I know That twenty centuries of human sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a glowing screen, And what rough bot, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards the network to be born?


    Part 7: Conclusion & Next Steps

    W.B. Yeats stands as a titan of literature because he did not just write about his time; he wrote about the cycles of time. [span_62](start_span)In The Second Coming, he gave us the vocabulary to describe the feeling of impending doom—whether it's a world war, a pandemic, or a climate catastrophe[span_62](end_span). [span_63](start_span)In On Being Asked for a War Poem, he gave us a controversial but essential defense of the artist's right to remain independent[span_63](end_span).

    To truly master these poems, you must read them not just as historical documents, but as living texts. The "rough beast" is always slouching towards us; the "gyre" is always widening. [span_64](start_span)The question is: will you be the falcon that gets lost, or the poet who finds the words to describe the storm?[span_64](end_span)


    Works Cited

    Barad, Dilip. "W.H. Auden: Poems." Dilip Barad's Blog, 2021, https://blog.dilipbarad.com/2021/05/whauden-poems.html?m=1.
    "On Being Asked for a War Poem." YouTube, uploaded by Dilip Barad, 28 Jan. 2021, https://youtu.be/I0eIBObJ7Ys.
    "Podcast on 'The Second Coming' and 'On Being Asked for a War Poem'." YouTube, uploaded by Dilip Barad, 1 Feb. 2021, https://youtu.be/jAaWDvA2Gt4.
    "The Second Coming." YouTube, uploaded by Dilip Barad, 20 Jan. 2021, https://youtu.be/C9qX3F0gsOQ.
    Yeats, W. B. "On Being Asked for a War Poem." William Butler Yeats: Poems, 1919.
    Yeats, W. B. "The Second Coming." William Butler Yeats: Poems, 1919.
    Yeats, William Butler. William Butler Yeats: Poems. 2025. PDF file.

Monday, December 22, 2025

The Bell Tolls for Thee: A Critical Inquiry into Sacrifice and Heroism in Hemingway’s Masterpie


This blog post is assigned by Ms. Megha Trivedi and will explore Ernest Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls.

Introduction

Ernest Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell Tolls (1940) is widely regarded as one of the greatest war novels of the 20th century. Set against the fractured and violent backdrop of the Spanish Civil War, the novel is not merely a chronicle of the Segovia Offensive but a profound meditation on the nature of loyalty, ideology, and the existential condition of man. For the student of literature, the novel offers a rich tapestry of symbols and a rigorous examination of the "Code Hero"—a figure who navigates a chaotic world with stoic discipline. In this blog post, we will undertake a deep critical analysis of two pivotal aspects of the text: the tragic, resonant ending of the novel, and the characterization of Robert Jordan as the quintessential Hemingway Hero.



Critical Analysis of the End of the Novel: "For Whom the Bell Tolls"

The conclusion of For Whom the Bell Tolls is a masterclass in narrative convergence. It is the point where the physical plot (the blowing of the bridge) and the metaphysical theme (the interconnection of all mankind) collide. The ending is not simply the cessation of action; it is a meticulously crafted tableau of stoicism, integration with nature, and the final affirmation of the "Code."





The Irony of Success and Failure

The novel builds intense tension toward a singular objective: the destruction of the bridge to halt fascist reinforcements. Critically, the ending is steeped in tragic irony. The bridge is blown—the mission is technically a success—but the context of that success is shattered. We know from the earlier chapters that the Republican attack has been compromised; the element of surprise is lost, and the sacrifice of Anselmo and the others is largely tactical futility in the grand scheme of the war.

Hemingway uses this irony to shift the reader’s focus from the political outcome to the individual moral victory. The ending suggests that in modern warfare, strategic victory is often ambiguous, but personal integrity is absolute. The blowing of the bridge costs Anselmo his life and Robert Jordan his escape, yet the narrative treats this not as a waste, but as a necessary fulfillment of duty.


The Physical and Spiritual Wound

The climax of the ending occurs during the retreat. In a chaotic scramble, a tank shell explodes, spooking Robert Jordan’s horse, which rears and falls on him, crushing his leg. This injury is a critical narrative device. In Hemingway’s universe, the physical wound often precipitates a spiritual crisis or revelation.

Jordan’s immobility forces a transition from kinetic action to intense psychological introspection. He is physically pinned to the Spanish earth he came to defend. This creates a powerful visual metaphor: the foreign interloper (Jordan is American) is finally merged with the land. As he lies there, he realizes, "I have fought for what I believed in for a year now. If we win here we will win everywhere. The world is a fine place and worth the fighting for and I hate very much to leave it."

This quote is essential. It balances the nihilism of war with a humanist affirmation. Jordan does not die cursing the cause; he dies validating the beauty of the world, even as he leaves it.


The Farewell to Maria: Ideology vs. Emotion

One of the most heart-wrenching sequences in the ending is Jordan’s farewell to Maria. This scene is a critical dissection of the Hemingway Hero’s priority of duty over love, yet it also attempts to bridge the two through a mystical union.

Jordan, knowing he cannot escape, must convince Maria to leave him behind. He adopts a metaphysical argument, telling her:

"Thou art me now. We are all one... Not me but us both. The me in thee. Now you go for us both. Truly. We both go in thee now."

Critics often analyze this speech as Jordan’s attempt to give Maria a purpose for survival. By framing her survival as the continuation of his life, he prevents her from staying to die with him (which would be a useless romantic gesture) and instead empowers her to carry the "concept" of their love forward. It is a pragmatic use of mysticism: he uses the language of spiritual oneness to achieve the practical goal of saving her life.


The Confrontation with Suicide and 'Nada'

Once he is alone, the ending shifts into a stream-of-consciousness interior monologue. Jordan struggles with the physical agony of his crushed leg and the temptation of suicide. He possesses a pistol and knows that capture by the fascists implies torture.

"You have to be very careful not to let yourself go just because it hurts... I don't want to do that business that my father did."

Here, Jordan references his father’s suicide, viewing it as a failure of courage. The ending becomes a test of endurance. The "Hemingway Code" demands that a man face "Nada" (nothingness/death) without flinching. To commit suicide to escape pain would be to succumb to fear. To wait, and to use his last moments to kill the enemy officer (Lieutenant Berrendo), is to impose order and meaning onto his death. He chooses to make his death "useful" rather than merely an escape.


Integration with the Earth

The final image of the novel is one of the most famous in literature. Jordan lies on the pine-needle floor of the forest—a motif that has appeared throughout the novel as a place of sleep, lovemaking, and planning. Now, it is the place of death.

"He could feel his heart beating against the pine needle floor of the forest."

This sensory detail signifies total integration. Jordan has become part of the rhythm of the earth. The "bell" of the title tolls for him, but because he is part of mankind ("part of the main," as Donne wrote), his death is a shared universal experience. He dies not as an isolated individual, but as a connected part of the natural cycle.

Critical Analysis of the End of the Novel: "For Whom the Bell Tolls"

The conclusion of For Whom the Bell Tolls is a masterclass in narrative convergence. It is the point where the physical plot (the blowing of the bridge) and the metaphysical theme (the interconnection of all mankind) collide. The ending is not simply the cessation of action; it is a meticulously crafted tableau of stoicism, integration with nature, and the final affirmation of the "Code."


The Irony of Success and Failure

The novel builds intense tension toward a singular objective: the destruction of the bridge to halt fascist reinforcements. Critically, the ending is steeped in tragic irony. The bridge is blown—the mission is technically a success—but the context of that success is shattered. We know from the earlier chapters that the Republican attack has been compromised; the element of surprise is lost, and the sacrifice of Anselmo and the others is largely tactical futility in the grand scheme of the war.

Hemingway uses this irony to shift the reader’s focus from the political outcome to the individual moral victory. The ending suggests that in modern warfare, strategic victory is often ambiguous, but personal integrity is absolute. The blowing of the bridge costs Anselmo his life and Robert Jordan his escape, yet the narrative treats this not as a waste, but as a necessary fulfillment of duty.


The Physical and Spiritual Wound

The climax of the ending occurs during the retreat. In a chaotic scramble, a tank shell explodes, spooking Robert Jordan’s horse, which rears and falls on him, crushing his leg. This injury is a critical narrative device. In Hemingway’s universe, the physical wound often precipitates a spiritual crisis or revelation.

Jordan’s immobility forces a transition from kinetic action to intense psychological introspection. He is physically pinned to the Spanish earth he came to defend. This creates a powerful visual metaphor: the foreign interloper (Jordan is American) is finally merged with the land. As he lies there, he realizes, "I have fought for what I believed in for a year now. If we win here we will win everywhere. The world is a fine place and worth the fighting for and I hate very much to leave it."

This quote is essential. It balances the nihilism of war with a humanist affirmation. Jordan does not die cursing the cause; he dies validating the beauty of the world, even as he leaves it.


The Farewell to Maria: Ideology vs. Emotion

One of the most heart-wrenching sequences in the ending is Jordan’s farewell to Maria. This scene is a critical dissection of the Hemingway Hero’s priority of duty over love, yet it also attempts to bridge the two through a mystical union.

Jordan, knowing he cannot escape, must convince Maria to leave him behind. He adopts a metaphysical argument, telling her:

"Thou art me now. We are all one... Not me but us both. The me in thee. Now you go for us both. Truly. We both go in thee now."

Critics often analyze this speech as Jordan’s attempt to give Maria a purpose for survival. By framing her survival as the continuation of his life, he prevents her from staying to die with him (which would be a useless romantic gesture) and instead empowers her to carry the "concept" of their love forward. It is a pragmatic use of mysticism: he uses the language of spiritual oneness to achieve the practical goal of saving her life.


The Confrontation with Suicide and 'Nada'

Once he is alone, the ending shifts into a stream-of-consciousness interior monologue. Jordan struggles with the physical agony of his crushed leg and the temptation of suicide. He possesses a pistol and knows that capture by the fascists implies torture.

"You have to be very careful not to let yourself go just because it hurts... I don't want to do that business that my father did."

Here, Jordan references his father’s suicide, viewing it as a failure of courage. The ending becomes a test of endurance. The "Hemingway Code" demands that a man face "Nada" (nothingness/death) without flinching. To commit suicide to escape pain would be to succumb to fear. To wait, and to use his last moments to kill the enemy officer (Lieutenant Berrendo), is to impose order and meaning onto his death. He chooses to make his death "useful" rather than merely an escape.


Integration with the Earth

The final image of the novel is one of the most famous in literature. Jordan lies on the pine-needle floor of the forest—a motif that has appeared throughout the novel as a place of sleep, lovemaking, and planning. Now, it is the place of death.

"He could feel his heart beating against the pine needle floor of the forest."

This sensory detail signifies total integration. Jordan has become part of the rhythm of the earth. The "bell" of the title tolls for him, but because he is part of mankind ("part of the main," as Donne wrote), his death is a shared universal experience. He dies not as an isolated individual, but as a connected part of the natural cycle.



Robert Jordan as a Typical Hemingway Hero


Robert Jordan is perhaps the most fully realized iteration of the "Hemingway Hero" (or Code Hero). Unlike the disillusioned drifters of The Sun Also Rises or the tragic lover in A Farewell to Arms, Jordan combines the stoicism of the Code with a dedicated political purpose (at least initially). To understand him as a typical Hemingway hero, we must break down the specific traits he embodies.


Grace Under Pressure

The primary definition of the Hemingway Hero is one who exhibits "grace under pressure." This is not just physical courage, but an intellectual and emotional composure in the face of chaos.

Throughout the novel, Jordan is surrounded by incompetence and treachery. Pablo steals the detonators—a catastrophic betrayal that ruins the safety of the mission. A typical man might despair or rage. Jordan, however, immediately recalculates. He exhibits a terrifying competence, adjusting his plans to use hand grenades and fuse wire. He does not waste energy on "what if"; he focuses entirely on "what now." This pragmatic stoicism is the hallmark of the Code. He suppresses his anxiety to maintain the functionality of the group.


Distrust of Abstract Words

Hemingway’s heroes are famously skeptical of "Big Words"—words like Glory, Honor, Sacred, and Sacrifice. They prefer the concrete reality of things they can touch and see.

Jordan exemplifies this distrust. He is fighting for the Republic, but he is cynical about the Communist leadership and the bureaucracy in Madrid. He explicitly thinks:

"You're not a real Marxist and you know it. You believe in Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. You believe in Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness."

He fights not for the abstract ideology of Communism, but for the people of Spain—for Anselmo, for Maria, for the specific, concrete reality of the land. He finds truth in action, not in rhetoric. When the politicians speak, Jordan rolls his eyes; when Anselmo speaks of hunting, Jordan listens. This grounding in the concrete is a staple of the Hemingway protagonist.


The Ritual of Skill and Professionalism

For the Hemingway Hero, doing a job well is a moral imperative. In a godless or chaotic universe, one creates meaning through professional skill.

Jordan is a dynamiter. He takes immense pride in his trade. The scenes where he lays the explosives are written with the precision of a technical manual. He worries about the placement of the charges, the speed of the fuse, and the angles of the bridge structure. This obsession with technique is his anchor. If he performs the ritual of his work perfectly, he imposes order on the chaos of war. His competence is his religion.


The Confrontation with 'Nada' (Nothingness)

The Hemingway Hero is often an existentialist who recognizes that the universe is indifferent to human suffering (Nada). The goal is to live with dignity despite this meaninglessness.

Jordan is acutely aware of his own mortality. He often engages in internal monologues where he chastises himself for worrying ("Cut it out, he said to himself"). He recognizes that death is inevitable and likely imminent. However, he refuses to let the fear of Nada paralyze him. He adopts a "live in the now" philosophy, telling himself to live a full lifetime in the span of seventy hours.

"There is only now and if now is only two days, then two days is your life and everything in it will be in proportion."

This ability to compress a lifetime of emotion and experience into a few days is the Hero’s victory over time and death.


The Tragic Wound and Stoic Endurance

As discussed in the analysis of the ending, the physical wound is a rite of passage for the Hemingway Hero. Jordan’s broken leg serves as the final test of his code.

A lesser character might beg for help or succumb to hysteria. Jordan sends his loved ones away to save them, enduring the physical agony alone. His refusal to commit suicide until he has completed his final tactical duty (ambushing the fascists) elevates him to the status of a tragic hero. He sacrifices his self for the group, but he does so without demanding praise or "glory." He does it simply because it is what a man does.



Conclusion

Robert Jordan is the "Typical Hemingway Hero" matured. He possesses the battle-hardened cynicism of Frederic Henry (A Farewell to Arms) and the physical competence of Harry Morgan (To Have and Have Not), but he adds a layer of selfless idealism. He follows the Code not just for his own survival, but for the salvation of others. In his final moments on the pine needle floor, holding onto his submachine gun and his sanity, Robert Jordan proves that while man can be destroyed, he cannot be defeated.

References 

  • Hemingway, Ernest. For Whom the Bell Tolls. Charles Scribner's Sons, 1940.

  • Baker, Carlos. Hemingway: The Writer as Artist. Princeton University Press.

  • Young, Philip. Ernest Hemingway: A Reconsideration. Pennsylvania State University Press.

 

Absurdity, Angst, and the Search for Meaning: The Core of Existentialism This Blog is a part of flipped learning a...